From: SDSVoc16 Subject: SDSVoc16 notification for paper 20 Date: 2 November 2016 at 13:38:47 GMT+1 To: Ruben Verborgh Dear Ruben Verborgh, Thanks again for submitting your proposal for the SDSVoc that takes place at the end of the month in Amsterdam. The Programme Committee's review is included below and we'll be finalising the agenda very shortly (I expect a draft version to be online by the end of this week). The papers received show the wide variety of approaches already taken for describing datasets, and the contexts in which they are used, so I am confident of a lively debate on that topic. We have also received papers covering high quality work around negotiation by profile, validation, tooling and more. Please can I ask you to: 1. Make any amendments to your paper and use the EasyChair system to upload the final version, or, if you prefer, just send it to me via phila@w3.org. 2. Take a look at the current attendee list at https://www.w3.org/2016/11/sdsvoc/attendees and let me know what changes need to be made (if your name is there and shouldn't be, or if it's not and it should). I would like to add the name of all speakers and their colleagues will attend ASAP so I can then open general registration up to the maximum capacity of the room. There's plenty of room for 2 per organisation and, at this stage, room for more if you'd like it. 3. Make your plans to be in Amsterdam! On that topic, you may like to know that Platform for Linked Data in the Netherlands is organising its latest meeting the following day, 2nd December, also in Amsterdam. There will be a link on the workshop website shortly. Thanks again, Phil. ----------------------- REVIEW 1 --------------------- PAPER: 20 TITLE: Your JSON is not my JSON – A case for more fine-grained content negotiation AUTHORS: Ruben Verborgh OVERALL EVALUATION: 3 (strong accept) ----------- OVERALL EVALUATION ----------- **(20) Ruben Verborgh. Your JSON is not my JSON – A case for more fine-grained content negotiation THIS PAPER deals with the delicate matter of content negotiation, arguing that although it remains the way forward for effective client server communication,there is a clear need of extending it with more granular negotiation options in order to serve different current and future web clients sustainability. The paper is well structured, and the author position is well explained and argued. Also, possible solutions are explained. The only drawback is that it is pretty general and doesn't focus only on VRE, DCAT or datasets… it's more at general content negotiation level (applicable 100% to VREs), a sort of urgent but transversal issue Nevertheless, I would suggest it for a presentation, as a first choice. As second choice, I can indicate the paper for a lightning talk+panel discussion (author as panelist). In any case, the author would be a good panelist. ----------------------- REVIEW 2 --------------------- PAPER: 20 TITLE: Your JSON is not my JSON – A case for more fine-grained content negotiation AUTHORS: Ruben Verborgh OVERALL EVALUATION: 2 (accept) ----------- OVERALL EVALUATION ----------- An information resource can be expressed in different representations, and through content negotiation, HTTP client and server can agree on which representation is most appropriate for the resource.This is a good position paper as it poses issues that MIME type is not rich enough for REST API content negotiation taking into account the rich variety of possibilities offered by today’s languages and data models.